Supreme Court to decide whether to hear St. Anne’s residential school survivors’ appeal


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email
Share on facebook

Supreme Court to decide whether to hear St. Anne’s residential school survivors’ appeal's Profile

WARNING: This story contains distressing details.

Canada’s top court will decide Thursday morning whether to hear an appeal by survivors of a Catholic-run residential school near Fort Albany, Ont., in an ongoing dispute with the federal government over the impact of withheld documents on compensation claims.

The group of St. Anne’s survivors, unidentified in court documents but represented by author and former chief Edmund Metatawabin, have been trying to have their cases reopened for years.

They contend there were “procedural and jurisdictional gaps” in the lower courts’ handling of the case — which has unfolded under the residential schools class-action settlement — and asked the Supreme Court to intervene in a March 1 filing.

Evelyn Korkmaz, a St. Anne’s survivor from Fort Albany, had mixed feelings the day before the decision: a sense of optimism tempered by a lack of faith in the Canadian court system.

“It’s going to be a big day,” Korkmaz said. 

“Hopefully they have the courage to stand up for reconciliation and prove to us that they are going to stand alongside us and uphold our rights.”

Evelyn Korkmaz, a survivor of St. Anne’s residential school in Fort Albany, Ont., says survivors will seek other avenues if the Supreme Court won’t hear their appeal. (Brian Morris/CBC)

Regardless of the decision, the survivors have no plans to stop fighting, according to Korkmaz.

“St. Anne’s survivors are resilient. We’ve been fighting for years, and we’re going to continue to fight,” she said, suggesting they would take the campaign to the international level if the court refuses to hear the case.

“If they decide not to allow us to appeal, we’ll have to pursue other avenues.”

Timmins-James Bay New Democrat MP Charlie Angus, a longtime backer, announced the filing in a July news release, calling the move “a damning indictment of the Liberals’ record on reconciliation.”

The Liberal government, in competing filings, urged the court not to intervene.

Speaking outside the House of Commons on Wednesday, Angus said the decision would “be a really important moment” not just for the survivors, but reconciliation generally.

“All the talk of reconciliation gets blown out the door when you get to the case of St. Anne’s,” he said.

“This is a serious, serious issue for this government and for the principle of justice in Canada.”

Government withheld OPP records

The Supreme Court hears only a slim fraction of the appeals filed with it. Last year, the bench granted eight per cent of the applications seeking leave to appeal, according to court statistics.

The legal dispute dates back to 2007 when the residential school compensation process began. The settlement agreement included a fixed payout for survivors and a claims adjudication mechanism, known as the Independent Assessment Process (IAP), for those who suffered extreme cases of abuse.

The deal required Canada to hand over relevant documents to accurately adjudicate IAP claims, yet the government withheld thousands of pages of provincial police records stemming from a mid-1990s probe into abuse at St. Anne’s.

The judge administering the settlement “assumed this was done by mistake” and not deliberate deception, but the withholding of documents left some claimants questioning if they’d suffered yet another injustice.

A group of altar boys at St. Anne’s residential school around 1945 in Fort Albany, Ont. (Edmund Metatawabin collection/Algoma University)

St. Anne’s survivors have recounted stories of harrowing sexual, physical and psychological abuse, including punishment via homemade electric chair and forcing ill pupils to eat their own vomit.

The police probe resulted in convictions for four former school staffers and one Indian Affairs employee on charges including indecent assault, assault causing bodily harm, assault and administering a noxious substance.

The group’s push to have claims re-adjudicated eventually got Ottawa to strike a review.

Claiming St. Anne’s advocates like Angus and Murray Sinclair were undermining trust in the settlement agreement, Crown-Indigenous Relations tapped retired judge Ian Pitfield to determine if the lack of disclosure impacted St. Anne’s IAP claims.

Pitfield concluded Canada should revisit 11 specific cases involving allegations of student-on-student abuse. The government promised to do it.

In their brief to the Supreme Court, the survivors questioned the Pitfield report, claiming it was rendered without consulting claimants themselves and without re-hearings by trained adjudicators.

Support is available for anyone affected by their experience at residential schools or by the latest reports.

A national Indian Residential School Crisis Line has been set up to provide support for survivors and those affected. People can access emotional and crisis referral services by calling the 24-hour national crisis line: 1-866-925-4419.

Mental health counselling and crisis support is also available 24 hours a day, seven days a week through the Hope for Wellness hotline at 1-855-242-3310 or by online chat at

Source link


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on email
Share on facebook

Want to be a sponsor?

Fill in your details and we'll be in touch